Is it illegal to eat the noodles on the high speed rail

“ high iron chipaomian is your anger ” become a network hot topic, high iron does not specifically prohibit to eat instant noodles to eat instant noodles, so high-speed rail is not illegal. But why can there be a case of eating bubbles and being scolded? Men and women eat instant noodles your anger who is right and who is wrong?

The Constitution stipulates that the rights that citizens should or may enjoy are not inviolable. Of course citizens, while enjoying these rights, should also undertake corresponding obligations. The rights and obligations of citizens are in accordance with each other. Below by Law Express small make up for you to answer questions about the related problems of high iron chipaomian:

1. Is it illegal to eat the noodles on the high speed rail?

In the long trip, the noodles have obviously become the necessities of everyone. High speed rail belongs to a strong sealed space. Everyone should self-discipline to maintain the health and order of the high speed rail, and create a good journey for everyone. There is no definite prohibition on eating the noodles on the high speed rail, so it is a citizen's choice to eat no noodles.

Two, eat instant noodles and other women's angry man who is right and who is wrong?

The Constitution and the law stipulate that the citizens of our country enjoy the basic rights, and the men who have met their rights should also fulfil their own obligations. From “ high iron chipaomian is your anger ” in the event can be seen not who is not who is wrong, but a little bitter.

First talk about the other woman's anger, perhaps she is out of the child's care and shouted abuse, but wrong. The woman responded by saying that her child was allergic to the face and had passed the man ditch, but the other side insisted on not listening. Whether there is no communication for the time being, although citizens enjoy the right to freedom of speech, the language used by women is no longer protected by the law. In such a way, things are not only solved but intensified, no matter what rights, the premise is not to affect others' normal life, nor to violate public interests and public order and good morals. Beyond this boundary, rights are no longer rights, nor are they protected.

As a mother who cares for her children, she shouldn't behave in front of children. It not only fails to set an example, but also surpasses the right to freedom of speech.

The man who eats noodles is the victim of the abuse, but it is not all the victim, because the victim is the other passenger on the high speed rail. The man eats the noodles without looking for the right place, and can go to the dining area provided on the high speed rail. Before eating, you should ask the opinions of the people around you, not to do what you want. While enjoying the basic rights of the individual, the basic rights of others should also be respected.

Three. How do you avoid this kind of event?

In the case of no regulation of the ban on eating instant noodles on the high speed rail, it is a citizen's personal choice to eat noodles instead of eating instant noodles, and it is a part of the normal life of the individual who does not violate the public interest. It is best to ask others to cooperate and give thanks, instead of standing at the moral commanding point, if they think they are discomforting. No one likes to speak or abuse others, to respect others, and to respect others first. Only when everyone exercises his rights, he can't go beyond the border. He can speak well when communicating with others. He can't excessively override himself with happiness and comfort. People can get along with each other equally. Public life is more beautiful and orderly.